| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

McGill Family Medicine Studies Online, 11: e04

Page history last edited by reem.elsherif@mail.mcgill.ca 5 years, 9 months ago

Ballard, Stephanie (2016). Adapting the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index© for use in the geriatric long-term care setting. McGill Family Medicine Studies Online, 11: e04. 

 

Download Thesis here

 

Background: Elderly individuals in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are at high risk for elder abuse (EA) and its related health consequences. However, currently available EA screening and identification tools have limitations for use in this population.

 

Objectives: 1) To explore whether an existing EA detection tool, the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index© (EASI), is appropriate for use with residents with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores ≥ 24 residing in LTCFs; 2) to adapt the content of the EASI (if required) to fit this new population; and 3) to explore contextual factors that may affect use of the resulting tool in LTCFs.

 

Methods: This was a mixed methods study sequentially integrating quantitative cross-sectional and qualitative descriptive methodologies. Results were informed by a literature review, internet-based consultations with EA experts across Canada, and data obtained from two purposively selected focus groups. Efforts were made to specifically distinguish between institutional or systems failure, and resident-directed abuse.

 

Results: Analyses resulted in the development of a nine-question tool, the EASI-ltc, designed to raise suspicion of EA in older adults with MMSE scores ≥ 24 residing in LTCFs. Notable modifications to the original EASI included three new questions to further address neglect and psychological abuse, and a context-specific preamble to orient responders. Resident reluctance to report abuse and a lack of defined reporting protocols/procedures were identified as potential barriers to successful EASI-ltc implementation.

 

Conclusions: It is expected that the EASI-ltc will advance understanding of abuse experienced by LTC residents. As any indication of suspicion raised as a result of the tool necessitates further abuse evaluation and institutional response, future validation of the EASI-ltc may lead to reliable EA prevalence data in this population. The next steps in this multi-phase research program will be to develop a research protocol to explore the practical aspects of EASI-ltc implementation, and to conduct a feasibility pilot study.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.