| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Godard-Sebillotte 2020

Page history last edited by reem.elsherif@mail.mcgill.ca 3 years, 3 months ago

Godard-Sebillotte, Claire (2020). Avoidable hospital use in community-dwelling persons living with dementia: impact of health service interventions, and primary care continuity. McGill Family Medicine Studies Online, 15:e06

 

Download thesis here

 

Abstract

Persons with dementia have twice the acute hospital use (Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospital admissions) as older persons without dementia. This hospital use dramatically impacts their health and quality of life. A share of this hospital use might be avoidable with appropriate ambulatory care. However, to date, we do not know how to reduce these potentially avoidable hospital use. The aim of this PhD thesis was to investigate how avoidable hospital use of community-dwelling persons with dementia could be reduced, especially by measuring the impact of health service interventions or primary care continuity on potentially avoidable hospital use. Addressing this overarching aim was accomplished in four articles. The first article aimed at measuring the impact of health service interventions on potentially avoidable hospital use in community-dwelling persons with dementia. I conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to synthesize available evidence on the impact of health service interventions on hospital use in dementia compared to usual care. Despite a comprehensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis, including predominantly unpublished data, no health service intervention beyond usual care was found to reduce hospital use in community-dwelling persons with dementia. The three remaining articles aimed at measuring the impact of primary care continuity on potentially avoidable hospital use in community-dwelling persons with dementia. In the second article, I conducted a descriptive study of hospital use of community-dwelling persons living with dementia in Quebec, over the last 15 years using the Quebec provincial administrative database. I estimated that around 40 and 60 per 100 person-year of community-dwelling persons with dementia had at least one hospitalization and one ED visit during the year of diagnosis, respectively. Between 20 and 30% of those hospitalized, depending on the indicator, had a potentially avoidable hospital use, with average length of Alternate Level of Care (ALC) stay of more than 4.5 months. Most indicators remained constant over the 15 years. In the third article, I described in a Method Brief, for a non-expert audience how advanced statistical methods can be used to strengthen causal inference from observational data, especially with propensity scores; the method I am using in the fourth article. In the fourth article, I measured the association between high primary care continuity and potentially avoidable hospital use in community-dwelling persons with dementia in Quebec. I estimated, using an observational retrospective cohort, with inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score, that high continuity with a primary care physician was significantly associated with fewer potentially avoidable hospitalizations (Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC) hospitalization and 30-day readmission). In addition, high primary care continuity was significantly associated with fewer ED visits and hospitalizations. The relative risk reduction for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition hospitalization (general population definition) in those exposed to high primary care continuity was 0.82 (95% confidence Interval (CI) [0.72;0.94]; P=.004) compared to the unexposed. The relative risk reduction for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition hospitalization (older population definition) was 0.87 (CI [0.79;0.95]; P=.002). The relative risk reduction for 30-day hospital readmission was 0.81 (CI [0.72;0.92]; P<.001). The relative risk reduction for hospitalization and Emergency Department visits were 0.90 (CI [0.86;0.94]; P<.001), and 0.92 (CI [0.90;0.95]; P<.001), respectively. In this PhD thesis, I generated evidence that could ultimately inform healthcare policies aiming at reducing avoidable hospital use in community-dwelling persons with dementia

 

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.